I originally used a 2TB Silicon Power UD90 as my Windows 11 C: drive, along with my games. A few months ago, I moved Windows to a 512GB Kingston KC3000 and kept the games on the 2TB drive so the operating system would stay separate and below roughly 50% capacity. After six or seven months, CrystalDiskInfo reports the Kingston at 96% health, while the 2TB drive is at 98%, despite the larger drive handling most of my game installations and downloads.
I recently bought a 4TB Fanxiang NVMe drive for my games. Should I keep the 512GB Kingston as my Windows drive, or switch back to the 2TB UD90 and sell it to help offset the new drive's cost? Is 512GB still enough for Windows 11 and normal utilities, or should I be concerned about the health percentage?
4 Answers
You’re probably overthinking it. A 96% health reading after several months does not mean the drive is about to fail; it generally reflects a small portion of the drive’s rated write endurance being used. Keep backups of anything important, but there’s no obvious reason to replace it just because of that number.
512GB is more than enough for Windows 11 and everyday utilities. Plenty of systems still use 250GB drives successfully. Unless you install unusually large development tools or keep lots of files in your user and AppData folders, you should be fine.
For a gaming and home-media computer, the 512GB drive should be plenty for Windows and a handful of smaller applications. The main limitation would be software such as Visual Studio or other development environments that can put a lot of data in AppData and user folders.
Separating the operating system and games is a perfectly reasonable preference, especially if you want the C: drive tidy and lightly used. It isn’t required for performance, though—you could also partition one larger SSD if you wanted the same organizational setup.
Related Questions
Lenovo Thinkpad Stuck In Update Loop Install FilterDriverU2_Reload