Is DISM RestoreHealth Really Stuck at 63.4%?

September 25, 2026 4 answers
Asked by MellowPine42
I'm running DISM /Online /Cleanup-Image /RestoreHealth on Windows 11, and the progress has been sitting at 63.4% for a long time. I keep seeing people mention that 62.4% can take a while, but I haven't found much about 63.4%, so I'm worried something went wrong. The DISM log in WindowsLogsDISM hasn't shown a new timestamp for about 100 minutes, and CPU usage is very low. Is it safe to stop the scan, or should I leave it running? I originally started this because Audacity kept crashing immediately when I tried to launch it, despite reinstalling it, running it as administrator, restarting, trying different installers, and checking my antivirus settings.

Answers

MellowPine42
I left it running, and it eventually finished after roughly five or six hours. It reported that corrupted files had been found and repaired, so Iโ€™m glad I didnโ€™t stop it.
Reply to this answer
SunnyHarbor_8
It may be downloading or processing fairly large repair files, so the progress bar can sit at one percentage for quite a while. Give it plenty of time before trying to cancel it.
Reply to this answer
QuartzFox7
DISM can appear frozen anywhere around 58%โ€“68%, and it may take a surprisingly long time to finish. Low CPU usage doesnโ€™t necessarily mean it has stopped working. Iโ€™d avoid interrupting it unless you have a strong reason to believe the system is completely unresponsive. You can also press Enter once to see whether the displayed progress is simply stale.
Reply to this answer
CopperVale3
If it truly stops making progress, Ctrl+C in the console can sometimes get DISM past a hung step, though it also acts as a cancellation command, so use that cautiously. Afterward, reboot and run the repair command again. If DISM repeatedly fails or doesnโ€™t resolve the original problem, an in-place Windows repair installation is another option, but make sure important files are backed up first.
Reply to this answer

Add your answer

Answers are reviewed before publication.

Related Discussions