Is TeamViewer noticeably faster than other remote management tools?
Asked by
MellowCedar42
I'm evaluating AnyDesk, ScreenConnect, Splashtop, LogMeIn Resolve, and TeamViewer for remote management. We're still testing firewall rules, but when the test laptop connects over 5G and bypasses the corporate firewall, TeamViewer feels dramatically faster and smoother than the others. LogMeIn Resolve has been nearly unusable at times. Is this typical, or could configuration and network restrictions be affecting the results? I want to compare the remaining products fairly before choosing one. AnyDesk is already ruled out for us.
Answers
MeshCentral is another option worth testing if you want a fast, flexible remote-access platform. It works across Windows, macOS, and Linux and can provide useful browser, terminal, and system-management access. It may not match every commercial RMM’s integrations, but it performed very well in repeated connection tests.
Reply to this answer
A slower product isn’t necessarily less reliable. In poor network conditions, some tools degrade more gracefully by reducing image quality, reconnecting automatically, or prioritizing input over video smoothness. I’ve seen TeamViewer perform best on a good connection, while other tools remain more usable when bandwidth is limited. Test both scenarios, not just the 5G bypass test.
Reply to this answer
TeamViewer may be fast, but speed isn’t the only factor. Its licensing and pricing can be difficult to justify, and other RMM platforms often provide better automation, integrations, credential handling, and endpoint management. For simple remote access, TeamViewer is strong; for full endpoint management, compare the entire stack rather than just screen responsiveness.
Reply to this answer
Splashtop has also felt slower to me in direct comparisons. ScreenConnect is worth a close look if you need more than remote viewing, particularly its background or backstage tools that let technicians work with services, command shells, and system utilities without interrupting the user. Some platforms offer a similar background mode under a different name.
Reply to this answer
That matches my experience. TeamViewer generally feels faster and more polished, especially for interactive remote control. That said, performance can change significantly depending on firewall traversal, proxy settings, relay selection, and whether the connection is direct or routed through a vendor server.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
QuietOrbit56: NinjaOne is one example with a background mode, although the feature names and capabilities aren’t identical across products.