Is the RTX 5090 a Fire Hazard? Should I Stick with My 4090?
Asked by
PixelProwler99
I'm considering picking up the RTX 5090 because money isn't an issue for me, but I've heard concerns about potential fire risks. I'm planning to use a Corsair SF1000 PSU; is this enough, or should I opt for something even more powerful to avoid any hazards?
Answers
If you're not too worried about cash, why not grab two GPUs? Just in case something goes south!
Reply to this answer
Honestly, I’m thinking about skipping the 5090 and sticking with my 4090 for now. Just not feeling confident about this generation. Maybe the 6090 will have a better reputation.
PowerPlayDanny: Upgrade your PSU to one with a circuit breaker. It’ll keep your setup safer!
Reply to this answer
I did hear about some 4090s having burned connectors even when undervolted. Just saying, be careful!
Reply to this answer
If you limit the power to around 400W, you really cut down the risk of any wires overheating. Just my two cents, but buying the 5090 and undervolting it could be a safe bet! Keep your FPS capped to match your refresh rate, and you'll be in good shape. Just make sure everything's connected right.
Reply to this answer
It's really not just about the power of your PSU; it's more about the GPU connectors and whether the pins are properly balanced. If you want to be extra cautious, look into a PSU with thermistors like the AsRock Phantom Gaming PG-G. These will monitor temperatures and cut power if things start to heat up excessively.
Reply to this answer
I’d recommend a 1000W PSU for the 5090. And honestly, there haven’t been major reports of fires from users yet; most issues are due to insufficient power supplies causing crashes.
ConnectorConcerned: Yeah, but the cables have definitely melted, so it’s more of an issue of there not being a fire yet.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
EconomicalEric45: Haha, I guess money becomes a little more of an object with that advice!
LaughingLiam21: Absolutely! First rule of building: why have one when you can have two at twice the cost?