Where do you route different types of monitoring alerts?

We route alerts by urgency rather than sending everything to one place. Critical events go to a paging system that can call, text, or push-notify the on-call person. Medium-severity issues create tickets and may send an email, while informational events stay in a dashboard or report. Email is mostly used as a record, since high-volume alert mailboxes quickly become background noise.

For critical systems, we use direct push notifications or chat messages because those are actually noticed. Less urgent alerts go to a shared mailbox, a ticketing queue, or a collaboration channel. A few people use a dedicated notification app or self-hosted alert service with severity levels to avoid being spammed.

Our useful alerts go into a shared notification address or service-management system, which creates tickets and assigns them to the right team. The important part is deduplication and ownership—one incident should not create dozens of tickets. Anything without a clearly defined action usually gets filtered or recorded without notifying someone.

Email can work when there are only a handful of alerts each day, but it tends to fail once the volume grows. We keep event history and aggregations in a dashboard for review, send actionable warnings to the service desk, and reserve pages for incidents that need immediate human intervention. If people are routinely ignoring alerts, the problem is usually alert tuning rather than the destination.