Would it be easy or reasonable to make all images and information collected by Flock cameras publicly accessible? It seems like transparency might discourage misuse and make the officials approving these systems more accountable, but I'm wondering whether public access would create even bigger privacy and safety problems.
3 Answers
The argument seems to be that decision-makers might change their minds if they knew they could be tracked too. That concern is understandable, but exposing the public to constant tracking as well would create a much larger harm than it solves.
That would probably make the core problem worse. People are concerned about being tracked and having their movements recorded without suspicion. Making the data public would let anyone monitor other people’s locations, including stalkers or abusive partners.
The issue isn’t just secrecy; it’s that the cameras collect location-linked information in the first place. Public access to license-plate images or facial-recognition data would make it much easier to identify where people travel and when, which is a major privacy risk.
Exactly. Making surveillance data visible to everyone doesn’t really protect privacy—it expands the number of people who can use it.
There have already been concerns about authorized users abusing access to track former partners or people outside their jurisdiction. Giving everyone access would remove even more safeguards.