We’re looking at replacing our current server-based printing setup. What should we compare, and are there cases where a print server is still needed?
What are good alternatives to a print server setup?
Asked by
3M+Ravlet
Answers
PaperCut is worth evaluating, but check the architecture before assuming it removes print servers. Some deployments still rely on them, and the right fit depends on whether you need shared queues, secure release, device integrations, or just centralized management.
PaperCut NG and MF also cover different feature needs, so make a requirements list first rather than choosing by product name alone.
Reply to this answer
Vasion PrinterLogic is another option to look at if the goal is to manage printers without relying on traditional shared queues. It offers user-driven printer installation and secure release features. I’d test it with your actual device mix and deployment model before committing.
Reply to this answer
Printix may suit a cloud-managed setup, but verify client and device compatibility, especially for warehouse tablets. Support can vary by operating system and printer workflow, so test the exact tablet models and how users select or release jobs.
m3+Nolwick:
Also test what happens when a device is offline or has limited access to your network. That can expose practical gaps early.
Reply to this answer
UniFLOW Online has been used successfully in environments built around Canon devices, while another deployment reported instability with its agent. That makes a proof of concept especially useful. Include client reliability, printer compatibility, and support for your specific workflows in the evaluation.
Reply to this answer
Before selecting a product, pin down what “serverless” means for your setup. If you only want to retire the physical server, a cloud service may help. If you still need shared queues, vendor toner monitoring, or other software currently running on that server, those dependencies may need another home.
Microsoft Universal Print could be worth testing if your licensing includes it. Compare its device support and operational fit with the other options, and check whether the toner service can run without your existing server.
3M+Ravlet:
We do have a toner service tied to a server process, so we’ll ask the vendor whether it supports another deployment method.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
3M+Ravlet:
That’s helpful. We’ll separate the queue requirements from the secure-print features when we compare options.