The 8600G has stronger integrated graphics than the older AM4 APUs and leaves room for future AM5 upgrades. Why does it seem to get recommended less often for budget builds or as a starting point before adding a graphics card?
Why don't AM5 APUs seem as popular as the 5600G and 5700G?
Asked by
h42+turnabout_807
Answers
A lot of it comes down to the price of the whole build. AM4 stayed around as the cheaper platform, while AM5 needed a newer motherboard and DDR5 memory. Even if the 8600G itself looked reasonable, the total could push a budget build out of reach.
Depending on local prices, an AM4 system with a cheaper discrete GPU could also be a better gaming deal. The upgrade path on AM5 is nice, but you have to pay for it upfront.
Reply to this answer
The 5600G and 5700G also arrived at a particular time. Discrete GPUs were expensive and hard to find, so having usable graphics built in solved a real problem. Most regular AM4 Ryzen CPUs needed a separate card just to produce a display.
That pressure was less severe when the AM5 G chips arrived. They still work as a stopgap, but a stopgap is less compelling when buying a discrete GPU is easier.
Reply to this answer
There's a tradeoff if you know a graphics card is coming later. The 8600G and 8700G have less L3 cache and fewer PCIe lanes than comparable regular Ryzen desktop chips, and they use PCIe 4.0 rather than 5.0. That doesn't make them bad CPUs, but the stronger integrated graphics aren't free.
Once you add a discrete GPU, the extra graphics capability on the G chip matters less. A regular Ryzen CPU plus a card may make more sense for a gaming build intended to last, though the price difference and games you play matter too.
h42+turnabout_807:
So the upgrade path is still there, but the processor itself might be a less attractive match for the eventual GPU?
Wexby__perhaps:
Right. You can add a card, but you're still living with the G chip's CPU and connectivity tradeoffs unless you replace the processor too.
Reply to this answer
Not everyone buying an APU is waiting for a graphics card. If the integrated graphics already cover your games or you just need a compact machine for everyday use, an 8600G can be the whole plan. The stronger graphics matter much more in that case.
Reply to this answer
For a basic display, most regular AM5 Ryzen desktop CPUs already have integrated graphics, with some exceptions such as F models. That's enough for desktop work or troubleshooting without paying for the much stronger graphics in a G chip.
That leaves a narrower gap for the G models: people who need more than basic display output but don't want a discrete GPU.
7u~notebook_528:
The basic graphics and the G chips aren't interchangeable for gaming, though. Check the specific games and settings before counting on either one.
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
j84+sidefolder_6:
It's worth pricing the CPU, board and memory together rather than comparing just the processors. The result can change quite a bit between markets.