I'm curious if using ChatGPT to help with writing a book is considered wrong. By 'assist,' I mean things like error checking, suggesting revisions, fixing continuity issues, and offering advanced rephrasing, all while the author maintains full creative control and decides what to publish. Essentially, using AI as a sophisticated tool where the human author is ultimately responsible for the final work. What do you all think about this?
3 Answers
Yeah, I think it's fine! Writers often hire editors to fix these same issues, so using AI feels similar. Just remember that while AI can help, it often lacks the personal touch that makes your work unique.
It's definitely a gray area—using AI should enhance your creativity, not take it away. But it’s like any tool; it depends on how you use it. If it helps you write better, why not?
Exactly! If AI can spark ideas or provide inspiration, it can be a valuable asset in the writing process.
I say go for it! Assistance with simple stuff like typos and continuity isn’t a big deal. Those aren’t about personal style, just technical issues. If it makes your writing better and you're still in charge, what's the harm?
But what would you consider crossing the line? Is there a point where it becomes 'too much' AI help?
Definitely! But I feel like AI misses the artist's intuition. That's what makes stories resonate!