I'm curious about how everyone deals with zip file management in their environments. Do you stick with the built-in Windows zip extractor, use something like 7-Zip, NanaZip, or perhaps another option? I recently noticed that 7-Zip just released version 25.00, but it still hasn't integrated well with the new context menu in Windows, plus there have been some concerns over past vulnerabilities. Should I transition to NanaZip or just rely on Windows' built-in functionality, which is pretty solid these days?
5 Answers
We really like NanaZip around here! It integrates seamlessly with Windows 11's context menu and handles password-protected zips, which the built-in option can’t do. Still, we occasionally receive requests for 7-Zip, especially from users in IT who need it for advanced features like encryption but that’s becoming less common.
Good point! But the encryption is a must-have for many businesses, so I’m all for keeping NanaZip around.
While 7-Zip is still a go-to for many, I think it’s crucial to assess the importance of keeping third-party software versus relying on built-in tools. Many tools—including the built-in zip manager—have had vulnerabilities, so it's about balancing risks. I personally support pursuing user training for ease of use instead of just installing additional applications whenever possible.
For sure! It’s all about user competency; with a bit of training, they might not even need a third-party software.
This makes sense, especially considering we deal with sensitive info! User training could definitely avoid unnecessary risks.
Since Windows 11, the built-in zip extractor can handle .7z files and archives larger than 4 GB, which is pretty neat. We've switched to using the built-in option for new deployments, and it seems to be working out well without any complaints so far. Just keep in mind that it doesn’t support password-protected archives, which might be a dealbreaker for some.
That’s good to know! I had issues with it not handling password-protected files previously, so I might still need a third-party option.
Yeah, I agree! For complex files, we still keep 7-Zip handy because it keeps working even when Windows throws up an error due to long file names.
Honestly, I just stick with the built-in extractor for most of the work we do. It's fast enough for standard needs, and so far, no one has complained about it. Any time someone needs something special, I help them out directly, so I’m not too worried about it.
That seems efficient! I like the thought of minimizing software installations unless necessary. Saves a lot of hassle.
Right? Less software can mean less support tickets and easier management overall.
I still use 7-Zip, personally. It's super reliable for when I encounter files with folders longer than what Windows can handle. Just the other day, I had a corrupt archive error on Windows, and 7-Zip zipped right through it. Plus, it’s rolled out easily using Intune for us! However, I have to admit, with Windows getting better at handling zip files, I might consider dropping it soon.
I totally understand! It feels like the built-in tool might cover most use cases, but having 7-Zip feels safer with that extra functionality.
Yeah, 7-Zip is a gem! The only times I’ve needed it in the last year were for those tricky files that Windows can’t open.
That's interesting! I just learned about NanaZip being a fork of 7-Zip. Does it face the same vulnerabilities?