Is a Hybrid AWS and GCP Setup Worth the Complexity?

You’ve raised a good point about resilience. It's crucial to assess if you're actually gaining anything by adding another cloud provider. If you're still vulnerable to outages in AWS, why spread your resources thin across GCP too? Have you considered how essential the ML and data pipeline components are to your application?

It sounds like you might be complicating your setup. Relying on two cloud providers could actually make things less robust because if one goes down, you're still at risk. A resilient strategy would ensure things continue to function even if one service fails.

Having made decisions on this before, I can tell you that hybrid solutions usually end up being more expensive and complicated. The real cost of managing dual environments often gets underestimated. It might be more straightforward and cost-effective to stick with one cloud provider.

Don’t forget to let your business needs guide your strategy. If multi-cloud is necessary for contractual obligations or data reputation, then it makes sense. Talk to team members who understand what the company actually needs, and you might find that a simpler solution could still meet those requirements.

Remember, multi-cloud setups often mean higher maintenance costs. If you haven’t factored in egress costs yet, you might want to reevaluate your calculations. It’s important to make sure the savings from using GCP outweigh those additional expenses.