What’s the best low-cost Azure option for a simple internal Node.js web app?

0
0
Asked By MellowOrbit42 On

I'm building a very small Node.js web app for staff in my organization. Users will select a few dropdown options, and the app will generate a sample file name. Usage should be light, so I'm looking for the simplest and least expensive way to host it in Azure. Would a free-tier VM or another service be the best choice?

4 Answers

Answered By PixelHarbor19 On

If the application is essentially a static site, Azure Static Web Apps would probably be simpler and potentially free. It works well for frontend code and can deploy directly from a source repository, but it has more limitations for server-side Node.js functionality.

Answered By NorthwindKite5 On

If you need a Node.js backend but want to keep costs low, Azure Container Apps is another option. Configure it to scale to zero when idle, though you should still check the pricing and startup behavior for your organization’s needs.

Answered By CedarFox7 On

An Azure App Service is generally a better fit than managing a virtual machine. You avoid maintaining the operating system and can use built-in authentication to restrict access to your staff. Just confirm whether the app actually needs Node.js running in production, or whether Node is only used to build a static frontend.

Answered By AmberLynx28 On

If the app is already hosted internally, Entra Application Proxy could expose it securely without moving the application. You can limit access to specific users or groups and apply Conditional Access policies.

Related Questions

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.