With Chrome and Edge being the go-to browsers in many enterprises, I've noticed a growing interest in Brave due to its focus on privacy and recent challenges with ad-blocking. I'm curious about what people think regarding Brave's fitness for use in a corporate environment. Assuming we implement proper security protocols—like restricting Tor, managing extensions, and disabling the Brave Wallet—could we make a standardized version of Brave work within organizations? What are your thoughts?
5 Answers
We standardized on Edge a while back to avoid issues with performance and security that we faced with Chrome. We utilize Keeper for password management and turned off all features that allow password syncing. Our security team initially flagged Brave due to some privacy concerns, and we haven't looked back since.
Same here! We found out that using an ad blocker on Edge helped significantly reduce unwanted software installations.
From my perspective, it’s best for enterprises to stick with Edge. Using a single browser simplifies support and administration, which is crucial in the long run. Edge is basically a more secure version of Chrome, meaning most sites will work just fine. Plus, don’t forget to disable password syncing to personal accounts; I’ve seen it lead to serious security issues in organizations.
I totally agree! We are implementing strict sign-in policies for Edge in our organization to prevent password leaks, and it's worked beautifully so far.
Yes, disabling syncing is a must. After a security incident in our company, we made sure to block all personal sync features.
Honestly, I don’t get why businesses would want to use Chromium-based forks like Brave. Historically, they struggle with monetization, which raises concerns. Firefox is a much more viable alternative, considering it has strong privacy features and doesn’t come with the controversies that Brave has.
Exactly! Firefox has been a trustworthy option for years. It’s faster and allows users to keep their browsing environments separate easily.
Yeah, I’ve had mixed experiences with Brave on endpoints too. Many of our security tools flagged it as suspicious.
We’ve tried Brave on some devices, but the management overhead is too high. Since it doesn't sync accounts easily, it’s not practical for full deployment. It seems great for individual use, but not ready for enterprise scale.
True! Keeping everything running smoothly with as little hassle as possible is essential in an enterprise.
Right? Using Edge allows us to maintain all the necessary sync features seamlessly.
To be honest, Brave's ad and crypto features make it too risky for corporate environments. Even if you turn them off, the shady history makes me wary. There's just no compelling reason to introduce it when Edge and Firefox are reliable alternatives.
That’s my thought too. There are plenty of privacy-oriented configurations we can implement in Edge without the headaches Brave might bring.
Exactly. In my experience, sticking to Edge is safer, especially given its compatibility with enterprise setups.
For sure, Edge integrates well with our systems, making management so much easier.