I'm currently in a situation at work where we have only a single database that also serves as our production environment. We don't have any dedicated dev databases or backups, which makes it tough for me to test new features without risking actual user data. We've tried workarounds like creating test accounts, but it's not a complete solution since I can't interact with real client settings. Our team has full write access to the database, which is concerning as I've witnessed some risky SQL operations performed without caution. We've brought up the need for separate dev databases to our senior dev, but it's been dismissed. Honestly, this has been the most unprofessional work environment I've encountered so far and it's really got me worried. How common is this practice in the industry?
5 Answers
This is definitely not common among professional setups where data integrity matters. Most companies I know maintain separate environments for testing and development to ensure production remains intact.
Absolutely! There's no excuse for a modern company to mishandle database management like this.
Having only one database for both dev and production, especially without backups, is highly irresponsible. It’s surprising that incidents haven’t happened more frequently. I suggest you either start looking for a safer environment or create your own local backup process.
I agree, backups should be number one on any team's priority list. It’s only a matter of time before something goes wrong.
Getting out of that situation sounds like a wise choice unless there's a compelling reason to stay!
This sounds like a serious disaster waiting to happen! No backups and everyone having write access to a production database is just asking for trouble. I've seen companies operate this way, but ideally, every place should have at least a test or QA environment.
Yeah, exactly! Having no backups is just crazy. If anything went wrong, it could be catastrophic.
It's pretty standard in many smaller or older companies, but it’s definitely not a best practice.
You should consider suggesting establishing proper testing environments and handling backups yourself. If you’re proactive, showing the risks can help demonstrate the need for improvement.
I second that! Sometimes you have to take the initiative to push for change, even if others aren't on board.
Could also protect yourself by documenting any risks in case something goes wrong!
Honestly, it sounds a little sketchy. Are you sure this isn’t some kind of front for money laundering? I can’t imagine a legit business functioning like this, especially with real customer data at risk.
Yeah, no kidding! It makes zero sense for a company to operate this way, especially if they have the resources to do better.
I've been in environments like this before—it's often a red flag about management priorities.
That’s what I’m used to as well—multiple environments are crucial for proper testing and development.