Play Framework vs. Distributed Phoenix: Which is Better for Microservices?

0
0
Asked By CuriousCoder93 On

I'm planning to build a microservice that will run in a clustered environment with multiple instances. While I'm leaning towards using the Phoenix framework for this project, I'm noticing a decline in Elixir's popularity and think it might be wise to focus on enhancing my distributed Java skills instead. Has anyone here worked with the Play Framework, particularly with Pekko? How does it compare to using Phoenix for a microservices architecture?

5 Answers

Answered By DistributedDev88 On

When discussing microservices, don't ignore the importance of using an external queue like NATS or RabbitMQ alongside CQRS patterns. It's vital for scalability and having a polyglot system.

Answered By ErlangEagle On

Play isn't dead, although some might argue that! It's still utilized in many significant companies, according to what I’ve heard. If you're looking for alternatives, Helidon might be worth considering as well.

Answered By CodeConnoisseur45 On

Definitely consider the limitations of the JVM compared to BEAM. Some features, like automatic preemption of computations that BEAM handles, can be a bit tricky in the Java world.

Answered By JavaGuru88 On

Honestly, it really depends on your goals. Play can do the job, but it's worth noting that Akka and Pekko are designed from a time before Kubernetes became the norm. In modern setups, I’d often prefer Kubernetes over Akka, as it allows flexibility with frameworks. Just keep in mind that while Play is still in use, it’s not as popular or trendy as Spring.

Answered By TechieTraveler21 On

You might want to check out Vert.x as a very solid option for building reactive applications in Java. It's pretty robust and can support distributed systems well.

Related Questions

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.