I'm curious about what hiring managers look for in a 'successful' Azure project when considering inexperienced candidates. Do you think a project should showcase a variety of Azure services like networking, identity management, automation, and monitoring? Or, is it more important to excel in a particular area? What specific qualities do you value most, such as scalability, security, cost-efficiency, or maybe practical examples like the ability to manage migrations? I want to figure out what kind of self-created project could make a big enough impact to get a shot at an interview in the cloud computing field. For example, what about a cloud-based task management app built on Azure that emphasizes scalability, security, and automation? It could include features like Infrastructure-as-Code with Bicep or Terraform, hosting on Azure App Service, using Azure SQL or Cosmos DB for storage, implementing Azure AD B2C for secure logins, utilizing Azure Monitor for tracking, and having CI/CD set up with GitHub Actions. I hope I'm not dreaming too big here!
5 Answers
I'd much rather take a chance on someone driven and willing to learn than a lazy know-it-all. A proactive mindset can go a long way in tech roles, especially in fast-paced environments.
When hiring for specific roles, like a data factory manager, I'd prioritize experience with the exact tools needed for the job over general Azure projects. However, having your own projects can really help if you're aiming for a position as an administrator or architect; it shows initiative and relevant experience!
If you're looking to gain experience, the Cloud Resume Challenge might be a great opportunity. It helps showcase a range of skills across Azure and provides good talking points for interviews.
When I evaluate projects, I like to hear how you addressed real-world problems. If you can demonstrate knowledge of a three-tier application architecture, that's a plus! Talk about your challenges and how you overcame them. Remember, though, the job market is competitive, so don’t lose hope if others have built things at larger companies under pressure!
I want to see that you genuinely understand the basics and can get up to speed quickly; however, if I'm comparing candidates, experience often wins. Building in a lab isn't the same as real-world work. I usually prefer candidates who have hands-on experience with Azure.
Related Questions
10 Uses For An Old Smartphone
Midjourney Launches An Exciting New Feature for Their Image AI
ShortlyAI Review
Is Copytrack A Scam?
Getting 100 on Pagespeed Insights for Mobile is Impossible
Best Documentation Plugins For Wordpress