What’s the Best Way to Efficiently Store Binary Data in a JavaScript File?

0
4
Asked By SunnyDay27 On

I'm trying to minimize the size of my JavaScript file while embedding some binary data into it. Are there any methods that are more efficient than base64? Ideally, I want to store the data byte-for-byte without unnecessary bloat.

5 Answers

Answered By BinaryBuff On

Why not just go for an ArrayBuffer? It's a great way to handle binary data.

Answered By CuriousCoder42 On

Might I suggest reconsidering your approach? Depending on the MIME type for serving JavaScript files, you might be inadvertently hindering your efforts to save space. If you can, store the binary data in separate files and load them using fetch or XMLHttpRequest. There are also bundlers that can handle loading binary files directly.

Answered By CompressionMaster On

You might consider adding a layer of compression depending on your data. For example, you could compress your binary data with something like zip or RLE, then encode it as base64 or an ArrayBuffer. Just keep in mind that you'll have to weigh the additional space used by compression methods against any savings they provide.

Answered By SunnyDay27 On
Answered By TechGuru99 On

If you really need to embed data directly in your JavaScript file, base64 is pretty much your best option. You could theoretically create a custom base encoding with a different character set, but honestly, that's a bit over the top. Remember, JavaScript files are plain text (usually UTF-8), so you're better off storing binary data in separate files and loading them in as needed.

Related Questions

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.