I'm considering using OKTA to improve our user provisioning and application access process. I'm particularly interested in features like conditional access and limiting access to SaaS apps on company-issued devices. Given this, are there valid reasons to stick with OKTA, or should I explore competing solutions as well?
3 Answers
I've had a solid experience with Okta for the past three years, but recently, we've faced some frustrating issues like password resets timing out and account suspensions. It's been a tough month with these problems despite previously reliable performance, so that's something to consider if you choose Okta.
One thing to be aware of is that Okta can nickel and dime you with expenses, especially if you're using SCIM. If your budget is tight, you might want to look at Entra, which is included in your existing plan. It could serve your needs without additional costs.
From what I’ve seen, Okta is the best choice for comprehensive workforce solutions, but it can get pricey, especially with SCIM needing the enterprise plan. If you're also focusing on device trust, while Okta has extensive features, using Entra might give you about 90% of its functionality at a lower price. If you're looking for budget-friendly options, PingOne is worth considering, although it's not as user-friendly as Okta. Don’t forget to evaluate what exactly you need—if it’s just device trust or broader provisioning, that’ll shape your choice.
We really need to streamline onboarding and offboarding with our current setup using Google, so knowing what fits better for those processes is crucial.
That's good to know! We're more aligned with Google tools, so we might prefer something that integrates well without extra charges.