I'm confused about USB-C cables. There seem to be so many types, and I want to know how to tell them apart—especially when it comes to charging, displaying video on my TV, and transferring data. For instance, I don't want to use a cable that's too weak for my Nintendo Switch to display on the TV, but I'm also concerned about using one that's too strong and could potentially damage my headphones. It feels like this wasn't an issue with USB-A cables. Can anyone help clarify?
5 Answers
What do you mean by 'too weak' and 'too strong'? Are you worried about things like data transfer speeds and wattage? If you use a cable that doesn't support quick charge (QC) or power delivery (PD), you'll have slow charging or no display—that's what I think people mean by 'too weak.' But don’t worry, using a higher-rated cable won't damage your headphones or devices!
Welcome to the complex world of USB-C standards! The frustrating truth is that many manufacturers don’t adhere strictly to the specs. I know folks on the USB-C spec committee, and they often complain about this. For example, Nintendo doesn’t use standard voltages, and they ignore standard display protocols. They usually cut corners and create something that only partially works with other devices, which makes it tough for us consumers. As long as the cable supports basic USB-C, you should be alright—worst case, it might just charge slowly if it can't handle the voltage.
Some politicians think simply having the same connectors is enough! But in reality, the tech behind it is what's important, and it can vary a lot.
That’s why I invested in a USB cable tester! As for cables being 'too strong,' you're in the clear—such cables won’t harm your headphones or devices!
USB-C cables really are a total headache! I often find myself trying multiple cables until I find one that works for my needs. It definitely feels like a gamble sometimes!
Yeah! The right cable should just limit the power to what's safe. You'll be fine with over-rated cables as long as they fit correctly.