I've been using a prebuilt Acer Nitro since the start of COVID, as I couldn't find parts or other prebuilts available in my area. It's been running a 3060 Ti since it launched, paired with an i5-10400F. Although the system still runs fine, most other components are budget parts that aren't cutting it for the games I want to play anymore.
I've never built a PC before, but it's been on my list of things to do. I'm not in the US, so prices and availability are different. I've put together a budget build for 1440p gaming, but I'm also eyeing a pricier setup. I'm trying to decide if it's worth spending an extra 800-900 dollars on a better setup. I'd love some insight on how long I could expect the more expensive build to stay relevant and if I'll need to upgrade again soon.
I also noted that Nvidia equivalents are generally 150-200 dollars more expensive for me. For reference, here's my cheaper build: [Cheaper Build](https://pcpartpicker.com/list/7989Dj) and my more expensive one: [Expensive Build](https://pcpartpicker.com/list/QQz6Wc). I spent some time adjusting prices, but there's no big sale currently. I'm thankful for any tips or advice on whether the extra cost for the more expensive build is justified! Additionally, I'm not strictly on a budget; I just can't justify spending over 2500 on a PC since I've had my current equipment for over 5 years. Plus, I'll probably need to move soon, and my second monitor is over 7 years old with screen burn-ins...
1 Answer
If you're looking for a solid gaming PC that can handle upgrades in a few years, the more expensive option is definitely worth it. A 7800x3d will significantly outperform the 7600x, especially since modern games favor more than 6 cores. Plus, the increased GPU power will let you play at higher settings and FPS. Overall, I'd recommend going with option 2 for sure!
Thanks for the advice! I don't mind spending a bit more if it means better performance for the long term.