I'm curious how frequent it is for IT teams to have little to no say in vendor selection but still end up carrying the weight of the fallout when the vendor doesn't deliver. Recently, one of our departments decided to adopt a new off-the-shelf software despite it being less robust than our previous platform. The decision was made by a few influential long-time employees who were swayed by the vendor's promises of features that the software ultimately lacks. Now, IT is stuck trying to fill in the gaps and train everyone on this product they weren't involved in choosing. It's frustrating because it feels like we're being set up as the scapegoats for a poor vendor choice. How do others navigate this situation? I'm planning to shift my focus to learning this new system, but I'm not looking to put in extra hours for it.
5 Answers
Ugh, so relatable! I remember a time when a department bought a flashy software that was 'in beta' for years. I had to clean up after everyone. It's crucial to have a properties team that takes responsibility for the selected software; otherwise, IT carries the burden of fixing all the missing elements. I also advise tackling it head-on with your leadership—set clear expectations moving forward!
Absolutely hear you! It’s like there’s no accountability for the people who make the choices. In my experience, when IT isn't involved in vendor selection, it usually leads to a mess—and then IT has to clean it up. I get frustrated too! I think it’s vital to document everything and make sure your leadership knows the added workloads. At least that way, they can't pin everything on you.
I've lived this nightmare too! My previous job saw a lot of shady vendor deals, and IT was always left to sort it out. One time, I got a program that was supposed to be 'beta-tested' but ended up being a permanent headache. Document everything and prove the ROI of different products. Your role should be to guide the selection process, not just react to the fallout.
This kind of situation is super common. I've seen management get swayed by vendors' pitches numerous times. They forget to check the fine print of the contract and later, everyone in IT ends up scrambling to make it work when it doesn't meet expectations. It’s definitely infuriating! Just make sure to be clear about what you'll be able to deliver and push back on unrealistic timelines. Good luck!
I feel you on this one! You've got to be straight with your leadership about the impact of these poor vendor decisions. If they’re making promises that aren't delivered, don’t hesitate to remind them that you’re only here to help fix the mess they created. And don't be afraid to push for better vendor relationships or alternative solutions next time!
Related Questions
Sports Team Randomizer
10 Uses For An Old Smartphone
Midjourney Launches An Exciting New Feature for Their Image AI
ShortlyAI Review
Is Copytrack A Scam?
Getting 100 on Pagespeed Insights for Mobile is Impossible