I'm choosing between an RX 6700 XT and an RTX 4060, and both are within my budget. I'm mainly a casual gamer aiming for ultra settings at 1080p, not heavy ray tracing or productivity work. Is the 6700 XT's extra VRAM and stronger raw performance worth choosing over the 4060, especially for future games? I'm also concerned about driver support, upscaling features, and whether 8GB of VRAM will become limiting. Other GPUs are probably outside my budget for now.
4 Answers
The extra VRAM on the 6700 XT could matter as newer games become more demanding, even at 1080p. I’d lean toward it if you plan to keep the card for several years. Just keep in mind that AMD cards use FSR rather than DLSS, and upscaling support can vary by game.
A used RTX 3070 could also be an option if it’s clearly cheaper in your area, since it is faster than both in some games. However, it also has only 8GB of VRAM and uses more power, so I wouldn’t choose it over a similarly priced 6700 XT just because it’s a newer-looking alternative.
For regular gaming, I’d choose the RX 6700 XT. It’s roughly 15–20% faster in traditional rendering and has 12GB of VRAM, which gives it more breathing room for future games. The RTX 4060 is more efficient and has better ray-tracing performance, DLSS, and stronger creator features, but neither card is ideal for heavy ray tracing. For 1080p ultra gaming, the 6700 XT is the better value if the prices are close.
The RTX 4060 is still worth considering if you prioritize low power use, DLSS, ray tracing, or productivity applications. Its upscaling and frame-generation features can make it feel faster in supported games, but its 8GB memory may be a longer-term limitation. For straightforward rasterized gaming, the 6700 XT remains the stronger choice.
Related Questions
Lenovo Thinkpad Stuck In Update Loop Install FilterDriverU2_Reload