Why doesn’t the POSIX shell standard include arrays?

0
0
Asked By MellowPine42 On

Arrays seem like a fairly fundamental programming feature, so I'm curious why the POSIX shell specification doesn't provide them. Are there historical or design reasons behind this choice, beyond simple oversight?

3 Answers

Answered By CedarOrbit7 On

The main reason is historical compatibility. POSIX was intended to standardize behavior that existing Unix systems and shells already provided, rather than design a completely new shell language. The Bourne shell, which forms the basis of the standardized `sh` language, didn’t have an array type, so arrays weren’t included.

Answered By QuietHarbor3 On

POSIX shell is deliberately fairly minimal and is centered around launching programs, managing files, expanding text, and connecting commands through pipes. It treats command arguments and streams as the main ways to handle collections of data. Adding arrays would have made the language more complex and could have created compatibility problems across older implementations.

Answered By AmberKite88 On

Arrays are useful in plenty of automation tasks, so it isn’t that shells have no use for them. They’re simply non-standard extensions: shells such as Bash and KornShell provide array features, but scripts that require strict POSIX `sh` compatibility can’t rely on them. Portable scripts commonly use positional parameters, newline-delimited data, or external tools instead.

Related Questions

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.