We're a small business running two HP servers (Gen 10 and Gen 11) that host several virtual machines managed via VMware. Recently, Broadcom, which acquired VMware, eliminated many resellers and increased prices significantly, making it tough for us to afford their services. Our local reseller suggested we consider moving to Hyper-V instead. We're unfamiliar with Hyper-V and wondering if this switch is worth it in the long run. Has anyone had experience with Hyper-V or similar situations? We'd appreciate any insights to help us decide if this change is the right move for us or if our reseller is just trying to push sales.
5 Answers
Switching to Hyper-V is definitely worth considering, especially given Broadcom's recent changes. Setting up a Hyper-V cluster for your setup shouldn't be a huge challenge. There are plenty of tutorials out there to guide you through the process. You can also migrate your VMs easily too, which helps. A lot of folks are transitioning away from VMware, so you're not alone in this at all!
Totally agree! I've done several migrations, and it's generally straightforward with a solid plan.
I wouldn't hesitate to switch off VMware. Their direction under Broadcom is worrying for smaller shops. Hyper-V has become very capable and is definitely a strong contender, especially for Windows environments like yours. You already have existing licenses that can save you costs, so I say go for it!
Totally! My shop made the switch and it was smooth sailing. You'll adapt fast.
That's helpful! It’s nice to know savings can be a factor.
I personally moved from VMware to Proxmox and couldn't be happier. It’s a bit easier for small setups and much cheaper overall. Hyper-V is fine, but if you have a mostly Linux environment too, Proxmox might be a great fit. Performance-wise, I've had zero issues and the GUI is user-friendly. Plus, their community is amazing for support!
What convinced you to switch to Proxmox, if you don’t mind me asking?
I’ve heard a lot about Proxmox! What makes it better in your opinion?
Honestly, a lot of companies, even larger ones, are debating whether to stick with VMware. Hyper-V is straightforward and works pretty well out of the box, but it doesn't have all the extra bells and whistles of VMware. If you're mainly a Windows shop, I'd give Hyper-V a shot, but maybe play around with it in a non-production environment first. You could set it up on some spare hardware.
If you're not reliant on all VMware's advanced features, Hyper-V should serve you just fine!
Hyper-V's licensing can also be much easier on your budget, especially for smaller setups.
Make sure to prioritize your business needs over technical features. Broadcom’s shift suggests they may not care about smaller clients. Opt for something your team can support reliably. Hyper-V could work if you keep it simple. Just be careful about your licensing and what tools you use because they can hit your wallet hard if not managed well.
Exactly! Focus on what makes business sense now. Changing tech for tech’s sake can be costly.
True! Always look for sustainable solutions that fit your actual use case.
Just keep an eye on your backup strategy during the move, though. It’s key to ensure your data is safe!