Do Open Source Contributions Make Developers More Attractive to Employers?

You're really hitting two points here. On one hand, contributing to open source does make an individual a better developer since any experience is valuable. However, when it comes to hiring decisions, managers often look at a wider range of factors. Contributing might give an edge as a tiebreaker, but it's not the only reason someone gets hired.

Whether someone is "better" can be pretty subjective. If a new grad has consistently worked on an open source project and contributed significantly, they might be more skilled than someone who just focused on coursework. But it also depends on the nature of the project. A person who maintained a niche project might struggle with taking instructions in a team if they’re used to having total control. Definitely work on soft skills like communication and teamwork—those are often more important in a job setting than just coding ability.

In a situation where all candidates are equally qualified, open source contributions could sway the decision, but it’s not a determining factor. Ultimately, what matters most is the experience and how well it aligns with the job's needs. That said, contributing is awesome—do it for the love of coding and community!

Not necessarily. It really depends on the individual and the specifics of their experience. Open source contributions can enrich a resume, but it’s not a guarantee of quality or fit for every role. Sometimes the project you contribute to might not align with what an employer values in skills or teamwork.