I've tried various top-notch models like Gemini, OpenAI's systems, and Llama. Surprisingly, none of them come close to the capabilities of Claude, especially when comparing versions 3.5 and 3.7. It excels in understanding nuances and calling tools correctly. Is this effectiveness a result of it being specifically trained for this purpose?
3 Answers
I exclusively use Claude for coding now, and it handles tool calls like a champ! Honestly, it's the only AI I trust with my code because it just gets it right every time.
I think Claude's advantage lies in how it integrates understanding tools, resources, and prompts. This separation of concerns really helps capture user intent better. Plus, they’ve developed the Model Context Protocol with Claude in mind, enhancing its tool ecosystem and flexibility.
I’ve been pondering the same question! While models like Gemini and Deepseek are decent, they seem to struggle with tool interactions. Anthropic's development of the Model Context Protocol definitely seems to be a factor. But if it's open source, why can't others catch up? It's a fast-moving field.
Related Questions
xAI Grok Token Calculator
DeepSeek Token Calculator
Google Gemini Token Calculator
Meta LLaMA Token Calculator
OpenAI Token Calculator