I've been trying to decide between Next.js and Vite for my projects, and honestly, Next.js has been kind of a headache for me. I'm finding that adding server-side complexity isn't worth the hassle, especially when it comes to managing state higher up in the component tree while still keeping the frontend performing well. I've encountered a lot of challenges, and I'm worried that lifting state management even higher would require a significant refactor. As someone working in a small startup, I'm not sure if the investment in learning Next.js is worth it right now. Does anyone have suggestions or insights on how to make things easier?
5 Answers
Frameworks can indeed be a pain. A lot of times they're made to appeal to big companies and don’t necessarily fit every use case. I say: pick the tool that suits your project needs best. If Next.js feels like overkill, maybe it is. There’s also the argument that simpler tools like Laravel or Nuxt could fit smaller applications better.
Here are a few suggestions that could help you out:
1. If managing state at the top of your tree is causing issues, consider using React Context. You could set it up in a layout or page component.
2. When it comes to data fetching, avoid using state high in the tree. Utilize the React features like `use()` and `cache()`, which are designed for this purpose.
3. If you're in a crunch and need to get things done, you can rely on the 'use client' directive. This allows for server-side rendering on the initial load, balancing between SSR and a SPA feel through dynamic imports.
Thanks for the tips! Have you tried Zustand for state management instead of context? I'm using Zustand now, but I feel like Redux might still be easier for selective re-rendering.
I switched to Nuxt with Vue, and it feels a lot smoother than dealing with the complexities of React's ecosystem. Everything just seems more cohesive, and I have fewer decisions to make about tools. If you're frustrated with Next.js, I highly recommend giving it a shot!
Thanks for the recommendation! I'll check it out for my next project.
Sounds like a pitch, but I’ll keep it in mind.
Honestly, moving to Rails could save you a lot of headaches regarding framework churn. Rails is mature, conventional, and the documentation is solid. If you're trying to avoid complexity in your front end, consider switching to something that's a bit more established.
I totally get this! I deep-dived into Rails before switching to Next.js, and at times, I miss the simplicity of Rails.
Bottom line is, check if the complexity is absolutely necessary. Sometimes, you're tying a complicated frontend to an equally complicated backend when you don’t need to. You can still use Next.js as a simple SPA or just enjoy the features without diving into SSR.
You make a great point here. Not all apps need the full power of Next.js. Sometimes a lighter-weight option just makes sense.
Not all frameworks are the same. Nuxt and Vue work well for many, with great developer experience. Next.js has its advantages but isn't perfect for every scenario.