Advice Needed: Choosing the Best DLP Solution for 10,000 Endpoints

Out of those three, I personally lean toward Forcepoint. If you're going full DLP, it has some great features. Just keep in mind that things like policy management can be a bit tricky; it's not plug-and-play—it requires planning.

You might want to consider Proofpoint instead of the ones you mentioned. It's lightweight and integrates well with existing EDR solutions without causing issues like kernel panics. Their DLP dashboard is unified, which makes investigating incidents across various platforms much more manageable. Also, from what I've heard, Symantec's support is hit-or-miss, so I'd steer clear.

I had a terrible experience with Trellix. It’s slow and heavy on resources, making my brand-new laptop feel like it's running on an old HDD. It hogs CPU and memory like crazy. Symantec might not be great, but I wouldn't choose Trellix based on what I've seen.

I used to work with Symantec, and honestly, I wouldn’t recommend it. It was a real pain and required Oracle, which just adds unnecessary complexity. We switched to Forcepoint recently and were impressed with how well it handled detection compared to Symantec. Just be aware, the integration with web filtering was smooth, but its lack of action plans can be a downside since you can't customize headers as much as you might like.

When it comes to DLP, the most important factor is the policies you set up rather than just the tool itself. Forcepoint and others can work perfectly fine if configured right, but getting your business data policies sorted out takes real effort. It's not just about asking for recommendations—choose one that aligns with your needs! That said, Forcepoint has a solid reputation.