Are AMD’s 3D CPUs Really Worth It for Gaming?

Generally, the 3D V-Cache CPUs tend to outperform their non-3D versions in gaming. However, it really depends on what you're using the CPU for. If you're primarily gaming, the x3d series would be a solid choice. Just keep in mind that some games may benefit from higher core counts instead, but for most, especially in gaming, the 3D cache makes a noticeable difference.

One thing to consider when shopping for CPUs is the core configuration. For instance, the 9900x3d has some limitations due to its chiplet design, which may affect performance in certain scenarios. A more straightforward choice for gaming would be the 9800x3d with all cores benefiting from the 3D cache. Just make sure to check benchmarks for your favorite games before deciding!

In terms of pure gaming performance, the 3D chips generally give you better results, especially in CPU-intensive scenarios. But don't forget about the risks of buying parts piecemeal. It's better to save up and buy everything all at once to avoid compatibility issues down the line!

While the 3D CPUs are usually better for gaming, it can depend on your specific use cases. If you're also doing things like video editing or streaming, you might want to weigh how important core count is for those tasks versus gaming performance. For pure gaming, the x3D will usually give you a leg up over non-3D variants.

Most games won't really require more than 8 cores. So while the 3D chips perform better in more demanding games, overlapping use cases like productivity applications may lead you to benefit from a high core count CPU. If gaming is your priority, then definitely go for the x3D!