I'm thinking about using VHDX files to store and archive a lot of data like photos and documents. The idea of having everything in mountable containers that are portable is really appealing, especially since I have a ton of small files that take forever to copy. Before I fully commit to using VHDX format, I'd love to hear from anyone who has experience with it. Specifically, I'm curious about: 1) any experiences with VHDX file corruption that made entire disks unreadable; 2) how VHDX files perform over years (like 5+ years); 3) if there are performance issues with larger VHDX files (over 500GB); 4) the best practices for backing up VHDX files; and 5) whether you'd trust VHDX for irreplaceable data or stick with standard folders and backups instead. My goal is to create long-term archives of personal data—around 1-2TB per VHDX file—on reliable drives with regular backups, and I'm just looking for the pros and cons of this approach versus using basic file systems.
3 Answers
If you're considering storage containers, something like VeraCrypt could be a solid choice since it works on multiple operating systems. Just remember, no matter which option you choose, always have a backup solution to recover your files if something goes wrong!
Absolutely! I use VeraCrypt for project management too—it keeps things secure and separate.
VHDX can serve as a great archive, but it's a double-edged sword. If it gets corrupted, you're risking losing all your data instead of just a few files. Make sure you're ready for that possibility before you commit.
I have experienced VHDX container corruption before. Honestly, it might save you hassle to just store your files directly on a NAS or external media with backups. Using VHDX adds unnecessary complexity and risks for data loss.
I've had the same problem with VHDX more than once; I wouldn't recommend it for critical data.
Yeah, VeraCrypt is definitely a good option!