Can Two Instances of the Same App Share a ClusterRole in Kubernetes?

0
0
Asked By KoolCat42 On

I'm relatively new to Kubernetes and I'm trying to better understand how to handle permissions when deploying applications. I recently got a warning from ArgoCD after deploying an application (Alloy) in two different namespaces: `alloy-logs-prod` for logging and `alloy-metrics-prod` for metrics. The Alloy documentation suggests deploying the logging app as a DaemonSet and the metrics app as a StatefulSet, but both of them are using the same `Alloy ClusterRole`. I ended up having to manually delete the ClusterRole in one of the manifests to resolve the conflict, which wasn't ideal since it messes with my GitOps setup. I'm wondering if there are better practices for handling this situation without running into these kinds of warnings, or if sharing a ClusterRole is generally okay?

4 Answers

Answered By CloudWizard55 On

You might look into the Helm chart's options to see if you can namespace the resources by adding unique prefixes for each instance. Alternatively, using Kustomize could allow you to customize the manifests to avoid these clashes while keeping your GitOps workflow intact.

Answered By TechGuru99 On

Yes, two apps can technically share the same ClusterRole, but it's not recommended. Typically, you'll want to create separate ServiceAccounts for each app and bind them to their respective roles. This way, each app can manage its permissions without conflicts. ArgoCD is warning you because it detects multiple resources trying to manage the same role, which can lead to unpredictable behavior.

Answered By DataJunkie88 On

While you can run two separate Alloy instances for logs and metrics, it's worth considering whether it's necessary. Many setups work well with a single instance for both functions, which simplifies management and might cover your needs without resource sharing conflicts.

Answered By DevNinja77 On

It's definitely possible to share roles, but it might create issues down the line, especially with permission management. It’s better practice to give each application its own role, which allows you to manage permissions cleanly. If both apps need access to the same permissions in the ClusterRole, you might consider creating a specific ClusterRoleBinding that references both namespaces.

Related Questions

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.