Has anyone given OpenObserve a try?

0
8
Asked By TechySquirrel99 On

Hey everyone! We're currently using Dynatrace for our observability pipeline, but it's getting pretty costly, and as a small team, we're looking for open-source alternatives. I recently stumbled upon OpenObserve and found it promising, but I'd love to hear your thoughts and experiences with it before making any decisions. Please share your insights!

4 Answers

Answered By InsightfulCoder42 On

I've tested OpenObserve locally while working on some open observability projects. It’s user-friendly and pretty intuitive, but I found the UI to be a bit lacking during my small tests.

Answered By CuriousReviewer On

We’re exploring similar options, so take this with a grain of salt, but have you checked out Parseable? It's open-source and designed for teams looking for a unified solution for logs, traces, and events, all in one place with a clean UI. Plus, it uses S3-compatible storage to avoid scaling headaches. Just thought I'd throw that out there!

Answered By DataDynamo85 On

Yes, I run OpenObserve at a decent scale and have also worked with the Grafana stack. OpenObserve is definitely easier to scale, and they have clear documentation on that. Plus, it's a lot cheaper than Loki for complex searches. The team is very responsive on Slack, unlike Grafana. However, I do feel the UI needs improvement—it tries to mimic Kibana but can be tricky to navigate initially.

Answered By FranklyCurious On

If your team has solid engineering skills, you might want to consider the LGTM stack instead. I haven't heard much about OpenObserve; their offer doesn't seem particularly exciting, and some of their claims feel a bit sketchy. It's always good to verify things on your own!

Related Questions

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.