I'm currently using a 13900KS processor and considering an upgrade to an Intel 285k. Before this, I had a Ryzen 5800X3D, which dramatically improved my gaming experience, particularly in single-threaded scenarios, almost doubling performance. However, since the architecture of the 285k differs significantly from the 13th gen, I'm curious about how it performs in older games that rely heavily on single or two-threaded performance. I'm not into modern titles that benefit from advanced features like 3D vcache — I mainly play older games like Killing Floor 1 and 2, where I've noticed I'm still CPU limited, especially in the first game. So, any insights on the 285k's performance in these types of games would be greatly appreciated!
5 Answers
275k may have better single-core performance, but internal latency could be a downside compared to your current chip. You'll likely need to test it yourself to see how it handles those old titles. If it doesn't work out, just return it.
Benchmarks show that the Core Ultra 200 series might perform similarly or even slightly slower than the 13th and 14th gen CPUs. So you might not notice much of an improvement in older titles either.
The drop in turbo clock speed from 6GHz to 5.7GHz could hurt performance. It's tough to say whether the newer architecture will really help with older games. Just keep your expectations in check!
Honestly, it might be worth waiting for a newer generation like the 485k. Intel seems to always improve single-core performance with each generation, so you might have better luck then.
Be careful! The Ultra 200 series processors are often considered a downgrade compared to the 13th gen for gaming. Honestly, I'd rethink that upgrade unless you're experiencing serious performance issues with your current setup.
Totally agree! Older games often benefit more from IPC improvements than raw clock speed.