I'm currently using SentinelOne as our main endpoint detection and response (EDR) solution. I've heard that ESET has a really strong static detection engine, and I'm wondering if it would be beneficial to have ESET running alongside SentinelOne on the same endpoint as a way to enhance our security measures. Would this approach actually improve our defenses, or would it just complicate things without providing much benefit? I'm curious to hear about any real-world experiences with this setup.
5 Answers
You're going to face problems if you try to use them together. If you really want to layer your defenses, look for a solution that won’t compete with SentinelOne directly.
What's the specific security gap you think you're addressing by adding ESET?
Nah, they’re likely to conflict with each other. If you're looking for layered security, consider using a different EDR or security tool that complements SentinelOne instead.
Sounds like a terrible idea to me. It's best to streamline your security measures rather than add extra complexity.
I wouldn't recommend pairing them. From what I've seen, it tends to lead to more issues than it solves, like software conflicts and false positives.
I was hoping for more robust coverage for signature-based threats, especially if there are differences in detection across different regions.