My organization has some optional licenses for Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) available for machines that aren't managed by our corporate IT. I'm trying to figure out if it's worth it to install SEP on these systems. Does anyone have experience or advice on this?
5 Answers
Honestly, if those machines aren't handling anything too sensitive, I'd just stick with Windows Defender. SEP has a bit of a reputation for being a hassle to manage. It's not terrible, but Defender is generally seen as the way to go these days.
Wow, are we really still talking about SEP? I thought it was pretty outdated by now. Before you go ahead and install it, definitely back up your machines first just in case. It's worth double-checking connections with tools like PcAnywhere too, especially if you're managing remotely.
From my own experience, I'd steer clear of SEP. I've used it before and it really slowed down the machines. Plus, I’ve seen it crash systems, including Macs. Just no, it’s better to look for other options.
Just my two cents: If you have the option, run in the other direction. It's had a bad track record for over two decades. A friend even mentioned they wouldn't want to install it again due to issues during production rollouts. It really doesn’t seem to be worth the headache anymore.
I've had a pretty horrible time with SEP in the past. It’s notorious for being tough to manage, with updates breaking things frequently. Even if it has some features, there are many more reliable alternatives that have come out since.

Related Questions
Can't Load PhpMyadmin On After Server Update
Redirect www to non-www in Apache Conf
How To Check If Your SSL Cert Is SHA 1
Windows TrackPad Gestures