Is This HTML Radio Button Setup Considered Good Practice in 2025?

0
3
Asked By TechieNerd42 On

In my college web development class, my instructor showed us how to create radio buttons using a basic HTML structure. Here's what they taught us:



However, I learned from MDN that this method may not be the best due to accessibility issues. I believe the ideal approach involves using

and

tags to better group the controls:

Question A

My concern is whether the initial method is ever acceptable or if I should completely disregard it. I'm eager to establish professional standards from the beginning of my career.

Also, I adhere to Postel's Law: "Be conservative in what you send," and it seems the first method goes against that by depending on browsers to be lenient about what they accept.

4 Answers

Answered By HTMLHero On

If it works, some might say it's okay, but my perspective is that for professional environments, you want to be strict about semantics and accessibility. Remember, the 'if it works' attitude can bite you later when you need your code to be robust for various users.

LearnAndCode -

Exactly! As someone learning for a job, you want to set yourself up with the best practices right from the start. Being thorough with semantics and accessibility is key.

AccessibilityAdvocate -

That's true! Once you're in a big company, little oversights can lead to issues with accessibility tools like screen readers. Stick to good practices!

Answered By CodeGuru88 On

You're right that college courses often teach concepts rather than production-level code, but it's definitely important that they get the basics right. Semantic HTML should be a core part of your learning. It's not just about making things work; it's about making them accessible and semantically correct from the get-go!

DevInTraining -

I feel the same way! It's crucial we nail down these concepts like semantics and accessibility early on. They matter more than just coding—it's about building things right.

Answered By AccessibilityExpert On

Hey, just to chime in, as someone who deals with accessibility in browser engines, your instincts are spot on! Your professor's method is valid, but your approach minimizes mistakes and keeps things clear. Stick with

and

, and remember to link your
TechieNerd42 -

Awesome, thanks for the insight! It's great to hear confirmation on prioritizing accessibility!

Answered By DocMaster On

I’d suggest going with your version. Using

and

is definitely better for accessibility. Although MDN says you can nest inside
DetailedDev -

Your approach is definitely solid! It’s about building a better foundation and ensuring each element serves a purpose.

TechieNerd42 -

Thanks for the clarification! I see now that while implicit labeling is valid, I prefer keeping things explicit for clarity. It's not just about the individual tags, but using them correctly within a structure.

Related Questions

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.