I'm trying to figure out whether to remain in my stable but low-workload contract job or to take a full-time role that offers a higher salary and benefits but comes with more uncertainty. I've been a desktop support engineer for about eight years, primarily in finance environments. Stability is really important to me since I've had several shorter-term roles in the past, and I want to find a position I can stay in for at least a year.
Currently, I'm working on-site at a small office, supporting about 25 people. The work environment is calm, my manager is supportive, and the workload is very light—some days I barely have anything to do, which sometimes makes me anxious despite no one complaining about my performance. I've been told by the Head of Technology that he's willing to mentor me and help me take on more responsibilities over time, which could lead to learning about trading platforms and development support.
I'm earning 120k with 20 days of paid time off as a contractor, but there are no benefits. My contract is set to last about 12 months, although there are hints of potential restructuring soon. On the flip side, I've received a full-time offer for 130k plus a 10% bonus and employer-paid health insurance. The new job is mostly remote, involves occasional office visits, and expectations are still taking shape. However, it's a new role expected to entail more project-driven work with less structure than my current position.
My dilemma lies in the appealing remote setup and benefits of the new job versus the stable environment of my current role, where I could potentially grow in specialized systems. Should I accept the mostly remote full-time role for a moderate pay increase and benefits or stay in my quieter contract position where the workload is light but there may be a chance to expand my skill set?
5 Answers
I'd go for the full-time position without a doubt. You’re likely to learn a lot more, and it sounds like there’s better potential for growth in that role. Plus, who knows if that contract gets extended after a year?
It seems like there’s a lot of uncertainty here—my manager hinted at wanting to get rid of another full-time employee. I just don’t want to jump from one tricky situation to another.
Starting a remote job at a higher salary is enticing, but consider the reality of your work-life balance too. What's your priority—stability or growth? I feel like most people would lean towards permanent employment when considering the long haul.
Exactly! I just want to get it right this time.
From what I know, if you’re looking for remote work, make sure you really like the team dynamics before choosing.
You should really consider this: contracts can often be less reliable. Even if things seem stable now, contracts can end abruptly, and you could find yourself back at square one. A full-time position usually provides more security and benefits.
I just don’t want to rush into something that might not be as solid. It’s all about stability for me right now.
That’s true, but at the same time, the benefits in the full-time role can make a big financial difference in the long run.
Honestly, it comes down to what you want long term. If building a solid career in one place is crucial for you, the full-time role seems more promising, especially given the benefits. Do you think you’re ready to handle a busier environment?
I do expect the workload to increase, but I think it could be manageable since they want to develop IT infrastructure rather than just dealing with ticket work.
I’d definitely pick the remote job! Sure, it’s a new position, but the pay and benefits make it worthwhile. Just make sure you’re okay with more work and responsibility once you start!
The new job is with an advisory agency that’s only two years old, so I get where you're coming from. But I want to be part of something that’s really growing.
I've only been in my current role for a month, so I really can't say if there will be any options for renewal. I do know the role is funded for at least the next 11 months.