What are the differences between glibc and musl libraries?
Asked by
CuriousPenguin42
I'm really confused about glibc and musl. Can someone explain what these libraries are and how they differ in practical terms?
Answers
If you're trying to decide between glibc and musl, glibc is the more commonly used library and works with most desktop Linux software. Musl is lighter and better suited for specific use cases like servers or embedded systems, but it might not support all the programs you'd want to run on your desktop.
Reply to this answer
Basically, glibc is responsible for both C and C++ libraries, while musl only handles the C library. Musl aims to stick closely to ISO C standards, whereas glibc has evolved away from that a bit. They also arenโt ABI compatible, so unless you have a specific requirement, sticking with glibc is probably your best bet since most developers assume youโre using glibc when they write software for Linux.
NerdyNinja: Got it, that clears things up, thanks!
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
CuriousPenguin42: Thanks for the info! I think I'm leaning towards trying musl.