I'm not a software developer by trade, but I've noticed that for almost any coding-related job, interviews demand candidates to solve medium-level problems from sites like Leetcode. Coming from a non-computer science background, I find these challenges extremely difficult, and they're consuming so much time as I try to grasp even the basics of data structures and algorithms. I never wanted to be a programmer; I'm more interested in using coding for practical applications like hardware development with Arduino and Raspberry Pi. Despite stressing my focus on hardware coding, I'm still required to tackle these medium Leetcode problems—which feel impossible for me—and also answer higher-level system design questions. Why is this the standard, especially since it feels unrelated to my actual work experience?
5 Answers
Honestly, standardized testing like Leetcode is more about filtering candidates quickly, especially given the huge number of applications companies receive. This way, they can rank candidates based on their problem-solving skills even though it doesn’t always correlate directly with the responsibilities of the role at hand. It’s definitely not an ideal system, but it’s one that has emerged from the hiring pressures companies face nowadays.
People tend to confuse coding exercises with competitive programming; what's tested in interviews typically doesn’t require the skills you'd use in a competitive context. Employers have chosen these tests because they believe they help identify the right candidates for their needs, even if it may not seem relevant for every role. In hardware development, I expect a good grasp of data structures should apply, as they can indicate problem-solving capabilities that are indeed important.
In a perfect world, all resumes would be thoroughly evaluated, but with so many applications, coding tests serve as practical filters. While they might not measure someone’s actual engineering abilities accurately, they help employers gauge candidates in a uniform way. Unfortunately, this might make it tougher on those with experience in specific fields like hardware development.
When it comes to hiring, employers typically care about two main things: whether you can actually do the job, and whether you’ll be a good team player. Given how lucrative programming roles are, many applicants lack genuine coding skills. So, to filter candidates, many companies adopted coding challenges as a quick way to assess programming ability. While this method isn't perfect and may exclude some capable individuals, it’s a widely-used tool for initial screenings. Some firms also opt for asking candidates to present past code they've written, which seems like a more relevant way to showcase skills in a real-world context.
If you never intended to be a programmer, why go after programming jobs? Those roles inherently require a proficiency in coding and problem-solving. It seems confusing and frustrating, but companies typically prioritize skills that allow someone to tackle harder problems over hiring someone strictly for easier tasks. Think about adapting to these interview formats or looking for roles that are more aligned with your experience in hardware.

Related Questions
How To: Running Codex CLI on Windows with Azure OpenAI
Set Wordpress Featured Image Using Javascript
How To Fix PHP Random Being The Same
Why no WebP Support with Wordpress
Replace Wordpress Cron With Linux Cron
Customize Yoast Canonical URL Programmatically