Can Tree-Shaking Be Done in Java with Compile-Time Dependency Injection?

0
9
Asked By CleverCoder42 On

I've been thinking about tree-shaking in Java and whether it could actually work if we handle dependency injection at compile-time instead of at runtime and avoid using reflection altogether. Previously, I remember discussions suggesting that due to Java's dynamic features, tree-shaking might not be feasible. But I wonder if these conditions change things?

5 Answers

Answered By NinjaDev55 On

.NET has tackled this problem with a workable solution by using annotations to describe dependencies combined with some manual adjustments. It could be a model to look at for Java as well.

Answered By ProTreeShaker On

In my last job, we developed a proprietary tree-shaker for packaging our client application to minimize size. We specified one or more root classes, and the tool would backtrack to figure out the necessities. There were also controls to opt into packages as needed. It functioned surprisingly well, and the implementation was less complex than you'd think!

Answered By TreeHugger89 On

It's definitely possible to achieve even with some runtime dependency injection and reflection, as long as you define how DI and reflection are used at compile-time. Both GraalVM and Android apps implement this concept, so those are great resources to dive deeper into.

Answered By ModuleMaster2020 On

Isn’t this the exact goal of JPMS and jlink? They aim to help with modularization which could theoretically allow for more efficient tree-shaking.

Answered By StartupGuru On

Just a heads up: while you might gain some advantages like reduced startup time or smaller artifacts, the trade-off could increase compile-time complexities and affect how predictable builds are. It sounds tempting, but be careful as it might lead you into a noob trap.

Related Questions

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.