I've been looking for a genuinely high-end gaming monitor in the 38–43-inch range with a 3840×2160 resolution, 16:9 aspect ratio, a completely flat panel, and at least a 144 Hz refresh rate—ideally 200–240 Hz or higher. Older options include models such as the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 43-inch, Acer Predator CG437K, ASUS ROG Strix XG43UQ, and Gigabyte AORUS FV43U, but I'm not seeing many modern successors.
Smaller 27–32-inch 4K monitors now offer 240 Hz or more, OLED panels, and newer Mini-LED technology. Larger displays, however, seem to be moving toward curved ultrawides, curved OLED monitors, or televisions instead. Is this size and format simply too niche for manufacturers, or are there current high-end flat 16:9 options I've overlooked?
3 Answers
There definitely seems to be demand for something around 36–38 inches, especially for people who want to use Windows at 4K without scaling but don’t have room for a 43-inch display. The ASUS ROG Swift PG38UQ was a good fit for that niche, but it appears to be discontinued. An older 43-inch Samsung model or an iiyama G-Master 43-inch display may still be among the closest flat options, but neither represents the kind of new 200–240 Hz flagship you’re looking for.
The main problem is that this size sits awkwardly between a monitor and a TV. A 43-inch 4K screen has lower pixel density than a 32-inch model and usually needs to be viewed from farther away. At that point, many buyers just choose a small OLED TV, which gives manufacturers access to a much larger market than a specialized gaming monitor would.
Manufacturers probably don’t see enough buyers to justify developing a new panel specifically for this category. Large high-refresh 4K panels are expensive to produce, and the same technology can be sold more easily as a television or as a smaller monitor. Curved ultrawides and large OLED displays also attract the enthusiasts who want a huge screen, so flat 16:9 models get squeezed from both sides.
I’d still love a flat 36–38-inch 4K display. A 43-inch screen can be manageable from about a meter away, but it’s too large for many desks, while 32 inches can feel small for people who want a more immersive image.
That’s basically the market split: if it’s used at a desk, people often prefer 27–32 inches, and if it’s used from a couch or farther back, a TV usually offers better value.