What tools are companies using to monitor and track employee interactions with AI services at an enterprise level? I'm particularly interested in data-loss prevention features, such as detecting sensitive information in prompts and blocking or masking it before it reaches an AI model. I'd also like visibility into what users submit and, if possible, what the AI service returns.
5 Answers
Microsoft’s DLP add-on is another option if your organization is already heavily invested in Microsoft security tools. It may be simpler to manage alongside your existing policies, but check exactly which AI applications, prompts, responses, and channels it can inspect.
CrowdStrike has been demonstrating Guardian AI, an AI detection and response product that appears to include DLP features. One example is masking payment-card data before it is submitted to an AI model. Availability, pricing, and the full feature set may not be clear yet, so I’d verify those details directly.
Be careful when comparing products based only on prompt visibility. Some tools can see what users submit but not the AI-generated response, which creates a monitoring gap. During an evaluation, test both directions, policy enforcement, sensitive-data masking, reporting, and coverage for browser-based and integrated AI applications.
Cato Networks has AI security capabilities that may cover this use case, including monitoring and DLP controls. It could be worth comparing against dedicated AI security products rather than assuming your existing web security platform provides complete coverage.
Prompt Security, which is now owned by SentinelOne, is worth evaluating. Early testing has shown it to be a capable option for monitoring AI use and applying security controls. I’d still recommend a proper trial to confirm how well it fits your environment and pricing requirements.
That distinction is exactly what I’m trying to clarify. I’ll make sure any trial covers visibility into both prompts and responses, not just the outgoing request.