I'm new to Radeon graphics cards and recently sold my 16GB RTX 5060 Ti to upgrade to a Radeon RX 9070 XT. I'm gaming at 1440p and want to increase my graphics settings. The ASRock Challenger and XFX Quicksilver are both similarly priced and use three-fan coolers. Which one has better build quality, is less likely to sag, or tends to undervolt more effectively? I'd also like to reduce power consumption so the upgrade doesn't noticeably increase my electricity bill. My 750W power supply should be sufficient.
3 Answers
The performance and overall construction are probably close enough that price, appearance, and case compatibility should be the deciding factors. For sag, I’d use a small support bracket with either card rather than relying on the slot alone. They’re long and heavy, and inexpensive brackets are cheap insurance.
That makes sense. I’ll measure the case and plan on adding a support bracket either way.
I’d go with the XFX Quicksilver if the prices are close. This generation’s XFX cards have generally been praised for their cooling and noise levels, including the more affordable models. Just check your case first—the card is roughly 35 cm long.
Both cards should undervolt reasonably well; it’s more about the individual GPU than the brand. A modest power-limit reduction, around 10–15%, can often keep performance close to stock while lowering consumption and temperatures. With good airflow, some cards may run around 250–260W, but results will vary.
A vertical mount can also solve the sag issue, provided your case supports one and it doesn’t restrict airflow.