I'm about to build my first PC and want it to last at least five years. I'm looking for something that can handle competitive games at 240fps and most single-player titles at max settings, targeting 1440p at 60fps. I've found a list of GPUs available to me with their prices in USD, and my overall budget is around $1100. For reference, all used GPUs come with a one-month warranty, while newer ones might have three months or up to a year for some models. I've read that the 6900 XT offers great price-to-performance, but I'm wondering if a newer card might be a better long-term investment. Should I also consider the 3090, which is currently the strongest card available? I'm curious about a few other things too: 1) Is DLSS better than the new FSR? 2) Is frame generation worth it to justify getting a 40 or 50 series card? 3) What GPU would be better for future 4K gaming if I eventually upgrade my monitor? Here are the GPUs I'm considering: 3090 (24GB, used: $742), 4070 Super (12GB: $671), 5060 Ti (16GB: $618), 7800 XT (16GB: $600), 3080 Ti (12GB: $547), 6950 XT (16GB, used: $512), 6900 XT (16GB, used: $477), 3080 (10GB, used: $459), 9060 XT (16GB: $459), and 6800 XT (used: $388).
3 Answers
DLSS is generally better than FSR, but FSR 4 is catching up fast. For frame generation, it's currently a solid feature for upgrading. If you're aiming for future-proofing and better 4K performance, I’d recommend getting the 9070 XT for about $700 if you can find it nearby. It's a future-ready option!
What about going for a new 5070? It could be a good investment.
5070 costs about $1000 and the 5070 Ti is around $1150, so they might be over your budget.
I suggest you get the 9060 XT (16GB). It's a newer card and typically a better choice for longevity.
9070s are around $900 where I live, so it might not fit everyone's budget.