Looking for Guidance on Microsoft Secure Score Audit Scripts
Asked by
CleverSquirrel92
Hey everyone! I'm on the search for some help with creating an audit script for Microsoft Secure Score. We currently use Defender, which highlights certain machines, but I want a script that can run through our RMM to identify which devices have failed the Secure Score checks we're implementing. This way, we can figure out if our Group Policy or Intune policies haven't applied correctly or if there's another underlying issue. I know there are a lot of discussions about the validity of Secure Score, but my management team is focused on improving that number, and I want to enhance it for our benefit. Thanks!
Answers
Honestly, while Secure Score is good as a baseline, the real audit should focus on actual configuration drift rather than just checking compliance boxes.
Reply to this answer
Consider using Intune compliance to create groups similar to how it works for conditional access. Instead of starting from scratch, leverage conditional access for compliant devices. Not sure if this is exclusive to M365 E5 though.
Reply to this answer
It's crucial to explain to your senior management that Secure Score isnโt a definitive measure. It's more like a posture gauge that fluctuates. Youโll likely never hit 100%, and honestly, the exposure score might give you more insight on device safety.
Reply to this answer
Have you checked out CISA's SCuBA project? It might have some useful resources for what youโre trying to accomplish. https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/services/secure-cloud-business-applications-scuba-project
Reply to this answer
You can actually script the auditing using the Microsoft Graph API to pull Secure Score data per device automatically.
Reply to this answer
Just a heads up, if the policies are applied and working fine but Secure Score is still off, make sure to plan for that scenario. Itโs going to happen more often than not!
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
ThoughtfulTiger44: Exactly! If you're at 100%, there's a good chance your team isnโt really allowed to do anything, which isnโt sustainable.