I'm trying to wrap my head around the differences between AMD's multi-frame generation (MFG) and their Redstone technology. I know that upscaling technologies like FSR and DLSS are getting a lot of attention, with AMD being close to DLSS performance-wise. However, I've read mixed reviews about Redstone. I thought MFG had issues with latency, but why do some reviewers seem to favor Redstone despite the critiques, especially from outlets like Hardware Unboxed? Since I really dislike latency, I'm curious if I'm missing something. Should I be concerned about these techs when considering GPUs?
3 Answers
It's important to note that regular frame generation adds latency too, not just MFG. If latency is a dealbreaker for you, then you'll want to steer clear of both these technologies. While reviewers like Hardware Unboxed have found issues with Redstone’s frame pacing, the overall latency may actually be better than some older implementations, but it’s worth checking out specific reviews if that’s a concern for you.
Redstone is AMD's response to Nvidia's DLSS. While DLSS has many functionalities, including Super Resolution, Redstone's equivalent for frame generation is called MLFG (Machine Learning Frame Generation). All forms of frame generation introduce some latency, but DLSS FG tends to perform better regarding latency compared to others. MFG can add around 5-7ms latency, which isn't terrible if your base frame rate is already high (like over 60 FPS). The catch with Redstone isn’t just its latency but its erratic frame pacing that can lead to a less optimal gaming experience. So, it's not that reviewers are just picking sides—it’s more about the currently available performance and user experience!
Redstone isn't exactly the same as MFG. Redstone brings features like Ray Regeneration, similar to Nvidia’s Ray Reconstruction, with some other enhancements. While MFG is designed for helping with frame smoothing, AMD’s version struggles with inconsistent frame pacing. Instead of having a smooth transition like you’d hope for—say 1 real frame followed by a generated one at consistent intervals—it can jump around unpredictably, which is a major issue pointed out by reviews from Hardware Unboxed and Digital Foundry. That unevenness in timing could really mess with the gaming experience!
Yeah, many user reviews indicate that while the idea is strong, the execution has been shaky. People have noticed all kinds of problems stemming from frame pacing issues, making it hard to enjoy a smooth gameplay experience.