Why Can't We Upgrade VRAM Like We Do with System RAM?
Answers
Reply to this answer
SkepticBeetle17: Right? That's capitalism for you! They want you to keep shelling out for the latest models instead of upgrading what you have.
QuickWitRabbit88: I agree! If they allowed us to upgrade, that would hinder their sales strategy around newer models.
Reply to this answer
DeepThinker92: That's true! In fact, VRAM typically has a latency of 200ns, while regular RAM is around 50-80ns. The distinction in their speed needs is huge.
ChillFrog89: I think weโre getting hung up on terminology here. Itโs more about bandwidth for VRAM than just speed, and minimizing distance plays a huge part.
Reply to this answer
FreshFox11: Exactly! And then thereโs the added complexity of keeping things cool if we had removable modules. It just doesnโt seem worth the hassle.
CraftyBear77: That makes sense! Is there really any benefit in having upgradable VRAM then, if it wonโt work any better?
Reply to this answer
ChillFrog89: Exactly! Plus, making VRAM upgradable doesn't seem to align with Nvidia's business model, which probably prefers us to keep buying new cards.
SmartOwl33: A few Intel GPUs do allow some configuration by board partners, but itโs not user-configurable. Itโs about as close as we can get these days!
Reply to this answer
Add your answer
Answers are reviewed before publication.
QuickWitRabbit88: Absolutely! The precision in VRAM communication must remain tight, and any extra distance can really mess with performance.
TrooperPenguin3: I like where youโre going with this, but letโs not act like itโs impossible โ PCB trace length and signal quality are issues that can be tackled.