Is a Page with 60% Server-rendered HTML and 40% Client-rendered HTML Considered SSR or CSR?

It’s a mix of both! If the server delivers any HTML, it's not purely static – it’s definitely SSR at play. Even if the client does extra work afterward, many might still call it SSR because there’s that initial load from the server.

I’d say it's hybrid too! If the server is generating HTML and the client is just enhancing it, then you’re looking at a blend of both. People often overlook how important it is to have a fully functional initial state from the server if you want it to be considered SSR.

Honestly, just measuring by percentages isn’t that helpful. What’s key is if the content is ready for the user from the server. If everything they need is there at load time, it’s SSR; if they need to fetch more, that leans towards CSR. Terms can muddy the waters, it ultimately depends on user readiness.

For sure it’s hybrid! Just because you have both doesn’t mean one is more important than the other. It’s about how they collaborate for the final result. Also, this notion of doing it one way or the other is a bit outdated – many modern sites use aspects of both.

Great question! Honestly, it doesn't necessarily have to be a binary choice. You can view it as a hybrid approach where both SSR and CSR come into play. Some folks call it bi-render or progressive enhancement since part of the page is served statically while the client handles interactivity.