Should I Use Archinstall or Install Arch Manually?

If you’re okay with the default settings and know what you want, just use Archinstall. Just take some time to understand what each step does. It's easier than the full manual method but still requires some awareness of the installation process.

The manual install is worth it if you're keen to learn. It allows you to truly understand how Arch operates. But if your main goal is just to get a stable system up and running quickly, then Archinstall is perfectly fine. Just be aware that you should educate yourself about each step of the installation process, regardless of which method you choose.

I recommend using Archinstall for your first try. It helps get you up and running smoothly without diving too deep into the complexities right away. Once you're comfortable, set up a virtual machine and do a manual install there. That way, you can learn at your own pace without worrying about breaking anything crucial on your main system.

Honestly, I think Archinstall isn't as terrifying as some people think. I've set up my system using it without any problems at all. However, if you're eager to learn and get the most out of Arch, going the manual route is probably better in the long run. It's like a hands-on tutorial before you dive into the real deal!

If you're new to Linux, I wouldn't jump straight into Arch. It's not as daunting as some say, but you might want to start with a more user-friendly distro, then move to Arch later. However, if you want to experiment with Arch, Archinstall can be a good starting point but ensure you know enough to troubleshoot if needed.