I've been using Arch for about a decade, mainly as my daily work OS and for my homeserver, and I've been really happy with it. However, it feels like I have to keep up with so many changes manually by referring to the wiki, especially when it comes to updates and new recommendations. I'm used to tracking changes through .pacnew files but sometimes it feels overwhelming. I'm curious if switching to Fedora would mean that updates will take care of my settings automatically, leading to a smoother experience. Besides that, I'd love to hear what else might be different in Fedora compared to Arch. Security is crucial for my work and personal use, so I'd also like to ensure that Fedora meets those needs too.
1 Answer
So, having used both Arch and Fedora, here are the main differences:
1. You'll be using DNF instead of Pacman for package management.
2. No AUR in Fedora, so you'll need to find alternatives for some packages.
3. Flatpak is really useful in Fedora for installing apps, especially those not available in the official repos.
4. Keep in mind Fedora gets major updates every six months, so there’s a bit more upkeep compared to Arch's rolling release model.
Overall, Linux is pretty consistent, and many workflows from Arch can be replicated on Fedora without too much trouble.
I hear you about AUR... I keep the usage low as well, but I really rely on a few packages like OnlyOffice and some others. Just something to think about!